Trial readiness dashboard
Live readout for Tomato on 80 acres — adjust inputs in the trial planner.
Trial readiness
78
out of 100
Combines crop–pest fit, regional biology, chemistry transition load, and field structure complexity.
Crop / pest matcher
RNA and microbial fit for your target guild
Match score
69
Aphid complex
Microbial-first stack for Tomato; RNA slot reserved for registered windows.
Lower selection pressure—good candidate for early bio-first windows.
Chemical reduction estimate
67%
Modeled reduction in conventional spray load versus your stated baseline program, assuming compliant biological execution and documented rescue triggers.
Crop / pest matrix
Biological fit scores for Tomato across target guilds (0–100).
| Pest | Fit |
|---|---|
| Codling moth (Lepidoptera) | 62 |
| Colorado potato beetle | 62 |
| Aphid complex | 86 |
| Whitefly | 88 |
| Botrytis / bunch rot | 62 |
| Rust / foliar fungal complex | 62 |
| Plant-parasitic nematodes | 70 |
| Fusarium / soilborne wilt | 74 |
Trial design panel
Strip trial with grower-standard vs. biological taper
- Blocks
- 3
- Replicates
- 3
- Plot size (ac)
- 4.4
- Scouting
- Weekly insect counts with threshold-linked rescue triggers
Yield confidence
87%
For Tomato on 80 acres in ca central, BioYield models a 67% reduction in conventional spray load versus your stated calendar broad baseline, while targeting Aphid complex. Yield protection confidence is 87% under compliant execution. Trial readiness scores 78/100 based on crop–pest fit (86%), climate fit (86%), and transition complexity.
Field trial timeline
- W0
Trial setup
Flag plots, baseline scouting, soil moisture logging
- W1
Baseline chemistry audit
Capture current program and application records
- W2
Entomopathogen ramp
High humidity evening pass
- W3
Botanical knockdown bridge
Alternate rows / checkerboard trial design
- W5
Biostimulant coupling
Low bioload mornings
- W12
Mid-season readout
Compare pest pressure, canopy health, and rescue events vs. control
- W16
Harvest / season close
Yield protection readout, chemical pass count, grower brief export
Risk & control group notes
Grower-standard chemical check only
Conservative transition: taper one chemical pass at a time with side-by-side yield checks.
Border-row separation; untreated only on interior plots
Balanced risk: taper one calendar pass per window while holding a documented standard-care control.
Biological treatment program
BioYield Tomato · Aphid complex field trial
- Week +0microbial
Entomopathogen ramp
Beauveria / Metarhizium compatible tank-mix
Application: High humidity evening pass
Humidity-sensitive conidia—stack with adjuvant protocol. Tuned for tomato row spacing and typical spray capacity.
- Week +1botanical
Botanical knockdown bridge
Neem-derived azadirachtin (rotation slot)
Application: Alternate rows / checkerboard trial design
Short residual bridge while microbial populations build. Tuned for tomato row spacing and typical spray capacity.
- Week +3biostimulant
Biostimulant coupling
Seaweed polysaccharide + amino acid foliar
Application: Low bioload mornings
Supports cuticle integrity and stress tolerance during transition off broad-spectrum chemistry. Tuned for tomato row spacing and typical spray capacity.
Alternate microbial families every 2 applications; keep dsRNA passes ≥14d apart unless label specifies; record irrigation timing for UV/humidity audit.
Grower trial brief
Tomato trial on 80 ac — Aphid complex
Show whether biological protection can reduce dependency on calendar broad without sacrificing yield in California Central Valley.
Execution checklist
- Mark plots and record GPS boundaries before first application
- Log every spray pass (product, rate, GPA, weather) for bio and control
- Run scouting on the same day each week with shared trap placement
- Photograph representative pest pressure and canopy injury by plot
Data to capture
- Pest counts or disease incidence by plot
- Number of conventional applications vs. trial arm
- Yield or marketable grade at harvest
- Any rescue chemistry and trigger rationale
Proceed to wider rollout if yield protection confidence stays above 82% and chemical reduction meets 57% of target.